Skip to content

Cart

Your cart is empty

Continue shopping

METHODOLOGY

HOW WE TEST KYLA.

References covers what the published science says. This page covers what we have measured ourselves: what we found, how we found it, and what we have not measured yet.

What we measured

Results below are reported as ranges, with the conditions and sample size for each finding stated underneath.

RECOVERY

Up to 50%

Deeper heart-rate recovery between efforts at matched workload.

How we tested this
Heart-rate data from 14 athletes. Athletes compared efforts with and without KYLA at the same pace and output. Some did this as a between-session A/B, some as a within-session counterbalanced comparison, with KYLA on alternating efforts. The protocol varied by athlete. The result did not. Recovery between efforts was consistently deeper with KYLA. These were controlled comparisons run in real training, across multiple sports. A controlled study with Umeå University is next.

FATIGUE

Up to 25%

Lower blood lactate at matched pace.

How we tested this
Measured in a treadmill threshold session with Jeppe Risvig (1500m in 3:41, 10k in 29:30), against his three-times-weekly baseline as control. Currently being replicated across additional sessions and athletes.

OUTPUT

5 to 12%

Estimated sustainable output gain across a session of repeated efforts.

How we tested this
Modeled from heart-rate and lactate response at matched workload across 14 athletes, against sub-threshold power curves in trained athletes. Pending more direct measurement with power data on the next test cycle, and as part of upcoming research with Umeå University.

In detail

01The question

Does using KYLA in the rest between repeated efforts produce measurable improvements in recovery, fatigue accumulation, and sustainable output across a session?

Three markers. Heart-rate recovery between efforts. Blood lactate at matched workload. Perceived and modeled output across repeated efforts. Each addresses one part of the question. We report them separately.

02How we test

Three protocols, each designed to control for a different confound.

Within-session counterbalanced. Every second rest uses KYLA. Alternating rests within a single session. Controls for warm-up effect and accumulated fatigue, because KYLA and non-KYLA rests are interleaved.

Between-session A/B. Same athlete, same protocol, one week apart. One session without KYLA, one session with. Controls for individual variation and pacing strategy.

Longitudinal in-training. Trained athletes use KYLA across multiple weeks in their normal training, comparing against their established personal baseline. Controls for novelty and short-term placebo.

Workload is held constant where possible (SkiErg pace, treadmill speed and gradient). Heart rate is recorded continuously. Lactate is measured by finger-prick sample at standardised timing. Output is measured where the modality allows. Perceived effort is captured on the standard Borg scale.

03What we found

Across every athlete tested to date, the direction of effect has been consistently positive. We have not observed a single case of decreased recovery, increased fatigue, or no measurable change. The pattern is not yet statistically significant at current sample sizes. It has been directionally stable.

04Who tested it

Testing to date has included athletes across HYROX, mid-distance running and functional fitness.

A selection of the first 50 athletes using KYLA in pre-launch are featured below.

Jeppe Risvig. Mid-distance running. 1500m in 3:41, 10k in 29:30. Treadmill threshold sessions.

Pelayo Menendez Fernandez. HYROX Elite 15 athlete and performance coach. Three weeks of in-training observation.

Kenny Steger. HYROX Swedish record holder. Higher-intensity sessions.

Athletes tested in their normal training blocks, not in a lab. Some named with permission. Others remain private. See the first 50 →

05What we have not measured

We have not run a placebo-controlled trial against a non-cooling object of the same weight and grip.

We have not measured core temperature directly. We infer thermal load from downstream markers.

We have not measured long-term adaptation effects across training blocks longer than four weeks.

We have not tested in extreme heat or extreme cold environments.

We have not tested for effects in disciplines outside the formats described above.

These remain open questions. We will publish what we learn as testing expands.

06What we are testing next

Independent testing in collaboration with Umeå University. Aiming to start before summer 2026, with initial results expected at the end of Q3 2026. Longer studies on protocol and timing to follow.

Direct power and pace measurement on the next testing block, to convert the estimated output range into a measured one.

Counterbalanced protocols on additional athletes, to move single-athlete findings into multi-athlete confirmation.

Lactate replication across multiple sessions for each measured athlete, not just one.

Skin temperature on a subset of sessions, to anchor the mechanism in directly observed thermal load.

07The science behind it

KYLA is built on decades of peer-reviewed research into palmar heat extraction, arteriovenous anastomoses, and thermoregulation during exercise. This page documents what we have measured ourselves. The references page documents what the published science says.

View references →

This page is updated as testing expands. Last updated: 16 May 2026. For questions, requests for raw data, or partnership enquiries: hello@getkyla.com

Reserve KYLA Performance™